WikiLeaks founder free to leave Sweden
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is free to leave Sweden as there is no arrest warrant against him.
WikiLeaks founder free to leave Sweden
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is free to leave Sweden as there is no arrest warrant against him.
WikiLeaks to release cache of Iraq war documents: Newsweek
Whistleblower website WikiLeaks is teaming up with news outlets to release a “massive cache” of classified US military field reports on the conflict in Iraq, Newsweek magazine reported on Friday.
WikiLeaks’ Assange requests new lawyer in Sweden
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Tuesday requested a new lawyer to represent him in the ongoing Swedish rape investigation and suggested the allegations against him could stem from personal conflicts.
WikiLeaks founder’s lawyer unsure whether client is in Sweden
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s lawyer said Friday he does not know whether his client, who is being investigated by Swedish authorities over rape and molestation allegations, was still in Sweden, Swedish news website The Local reported. Leif Silb…
Whistleblowing website Wikileaks has said that the arrest of an alleged confidential source not affected by the U.S. military work. Wikileaks founders Julian Assange told BBC News that other potential whistleblowers should not be off the sending of material to be posted on the website. The U.S. has detained U.S. military analyst Bradley Manning on suspicion of leaking classified information on the website. Mr Assange not confirm whether Mr. Manning was a source. “We have our sources to protect try,” he told BBC News. “We do not know whether Mr. Manning is a source, but we understand it are allegations that are being taken seriously, so we tend naturally to try him [ ] to defend. “The U.S. Army in Iraq said that was Specialist (SPC) Manning in Kuwait and was placed” in pre-trial confinement for allegedly releasing classified information. “A video reports posted on the website of Mr Manning shows a U.S. Apache helicopter killing 12 people – including two Reuters journalists – in an attack in Baghdad in 2007. Two children were also heavy in the attack on the group, which injured several armed men included. “Sacred oath’Mr Manning identity was allegedly the U.S. authorities contacted by a former high-level hacker Adrian Lamo, which Mr. Manning had via e-mail and Instant Messenger disclosed. During their talks, said Mr. Lamo BBC News, Mr Manning boasted surrender military videos and 260,000 U.S. Embassy classified messages to Wikileaks. “At the moment he gave me the information, it was basically a suicide pact,” said Mr. Lamo. He has lent his name to the American authorities because of concerns about U.S. national security and because he did not want to be found to have “obstruction of justice” in the course of an investigation. “I did not want FBI agents knocking on the door,” he said. Mr. Lamo has been previously issued for the intrusion into the New York Times, condemned Yahoo and Microsoft. He now works as a journalist and security analyst. But Mr Assange questioned Mr. Lamo motives and credibility. “He has the sacred oath of journalism, the confidentiality of sources is broken.” Mr Assange also said that some of his account of true ring. “We do not recognize a number of demands by Adrian Lamo, Mr. Manning was allegedly related to him made – they can not factually correct.” In particular, said Mr. Assange have that Wikileaks has no knowledge of the 260,000 received in confidence that Mr. Lamo said Mr. Manning said, uploaded to the site. But how could Wikileaks never gives his sources confirmed the existence of the documents implicate Mr. Manning. In response, Mr. Lamo said he understood why Mr Assange would not concede to government handling of sensitive data. “I would not agree with them either,” he said. He also said that he approached not by Mr Manning as a journalist. “I was a private citizen in a private capacity – there was no source, journalist relationship,” he told BBC News. “I have wanted to tell him that I worked as a journalist. I would be happy to write about himself, but we just decided it would be unethical.” The story of Mr. Manning’s arrest was first reported on wired. com by long-term employee Mr. Lamo Kevin Poulsen, also a former hacker and now a journalist. “National threat’Wikileaks has a reputation for publishing leaked material set since their first appearance on the network in 2006. In November 2009 she published what it said were intercepted 573 000 pager messages during the 9 / 11 attacks in the United States sent. Previously it was posted a list of names and addresses of people said that the British National Party (BNP) are part and brought a copy of the Standard Operating Procedures for Camp Delta, a document that detailed restrictions on prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. the beginning of this year, the website published a 2008 Pentagon report that the site was considered a “threat to the U.S. military said. The document states that “the possibility that current employees or moles within the [Department of Defence] or elsewhere in the U.S. government are to provide sensitive or secret information to Wikileaks. Org can not be ruled out.” It goes on to say that discourage the “identification, exposure, post-employment, law enforcement, legal action against current or former insider, a leak or other informants could have similar actions … use [Wikileaks]. The U.S. government later confirmed to the BBC that the documents were genuine. “Protect sources’When the Pentagon document was leaked to the Web site explains that none of his sources ever knowingly exposed. Well, Mr. Assange said that Mr. Manning’s case, no people should be made of the contribution on the website.” We have deliberately our company structured to our sources, on pain of criminal protection, “he said. The website collects scattered no information about its origin and the use of many Web servers around the world to host content. Mr. Assange said this deliberately in jurisdictions – as in Sweden – that could pursue Wikileaks if it reveals a source. It is currently advising the Icelandic government’s efforts at legal protection for whistle-blowers to increase in the country. “We make it clear, [sources] that we protect them. “He said this would apply to Mr. Manning.” Provided that the allegations against [him] are true, we have taken steps for its protection and defense taken to court order. ”
The Wikileaks, the disclosure of 90,000 documents from the U.S. war in Afghanistan is evidence that on-the-ground commanders believe Pakistan’s intelligence agencies along with the Taliban. This comes a day after the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen discuss openly with Pakistani generals of Pakistan’s efforts against terrorism and violent extremism has been caught. Although it is generally known that the Taliban from Pakistan were greatly during the 80′s and 90′s, supports many of the military relations between the Pakistani army and Taliban have been kept active post 9 / 11 also. This is contrary to what Pakistan, an ally of the United States, has allegedly fought in the war on terror in the past nine years. Measured in the dissemination of the documents, Pakistani intelligence, the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), allows members of its spy service directly with the Taliban in secret strategy meetings to organize networks of militant groups that fight against U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, and even to assassinate Afghan leaders hatch plots. “American commanders and politicians respond to these Intel by open discussions with the Pakistani generals in air-conditioned offices in Islamabad and promising 1000000000 $ in aid per year, together with modern weapons. Even the White House national security adviser said this morning leaks as destructive and welcomed the combined “Cooperation in the fight against terrorism between the United States and Pakistan. One must wonder who is double crossing whom? The Pakistanis, under the American money and work with the enemy? Or the U.S., with full knowledge of the ISI support for the Taliban continue with a Pakistani alliance in the war on terror? another integral question that is raised by this disclosure, is in his timing. In the week when Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton and the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen visited Pakistan on two sides of a conference in Kabul, the release of these documents means that someone is not in the army with the way things are handled happy at the official level. any purpose of these documents with the exception of the US-Pakistan harm alliance is not here. missed Meanwhile, reports Iranian media, the leak as an exposé in the immense number of civilian casualties by U.S. forces in Afghanistan had. According to Press TV, the actual number of civilian casualties previously hidden in public and played down deliberately. Press TV account makes a brief mention of the ISI confrontation with the Taliban. We invite our readers for their opinion on whether the current approach of the war on terror is the right way to express?
Confidential documents published in Wikileaks Afghan war. org, diplomatic, A Whistleblower website publish thousands of reports of more than 90 United States military in Afghanistan between 2004 and January of this year. According to Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks. org, who the document, the first report in which the raw data published on the war in possession of the military, including the number of dead, the victim, reports of threats and the like. Reports published since Sunday began yesterday.
“This is the story of total war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010 with some important exceptions – the United States Special Forces, CIA activities and other important activities, the groups are not America,” said Assange as reported today, Monday (26 / 7 ). To CNN, refused to disclose the origin Assange document. He has just claimed that the documents “depravity” of the war, the show reveal how many incidents occurred, plus the large number of civilian victims.
As confirmed by CNN, said defense officials of the Ministry of Defence would not say that until the Pentagon has a chance to see it. “This is the story of total war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010 with some important exceptions – the United States Special Forces, CIA activities and other important activities, the groups are not America,” said Assange as reported today, Monday (26 / 7 ). To CNN, refused to disclose the origin Assange document. He has just claimed that the documents “depravity” of the war, the show reveal how many incidents occurred, plus the large number of civilian victims.
U.S. diplomatic and military Afghanistan between 2004 and January of this year. According to Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks. org, who the document, the first report in which the raw data published on the war in possession of the military, including the number of dead, the victim, reports of threats and the like. Reports published since Sunday began yesterday.