As reported in The New York Times, were military secret? imperious documents? about the war in Afghanistan? over a period of six years? made publicly on Sunday. The documents are often obliged to contradict official Buchf? Currency of war and are sch ren? Concerning? Nocturnal controversy and debate.
The documents were obtained and showed probably illegal, but are too important to be ax? Disposed of frequently. Above all, they can perform and incomparable, such as the American military? Deliberately r and the establishment of Pakistan’s Double? Dependence in dealing with America and Afghanistan, all winked at the altar of political Appropriately? Accuracy. For example, there is increasing evidence daf? R, that the gem Tliche ratio? Ratio Pakistani military? R ISI, had been long with the Afghan Taliban and some elements of Al-Qaida was ma? Significantly involved in T? Processing and amplification ? mmelung American troops.
The test? Presidency George W. Bush was criticized routinely? Ig f? R the handling of the war in Afghanistan, but the reality t is that more American troops lost since Barrack Obama took office, in fact, Obama himself admitted that He knew what was going on: and the problem with Pakistan was the reason why it took so long to decide on a “surge last year. So the U.S. was forced to blow up the Pakistani military? R helping the Taliban American soldiers because it ben NATO truck supplies? Account of their country?
American troops in Afghanistan have long suspected that Pakistan’s military? R spy service orchestrates the Afghan asc? Ndisches to serve their purposes, w? While at the same time, the country has received more than $ 1000000000 a year ago from Washington. The irony is that the funds allegedly in recognition f? R help Pakistan in the fight against militants is much they are to help secretly.
The leaked documents, which lay close to Wikileaks, that Pakistan, w? While loudly as vertrauensw? Rdiger verb? Allies of the United States of America, erm? Glitches its ISI, the direct contact with the Taliban in secret strategy sessions whose purpose is to organize networks of militant groups fighting to kill American and NATO troops in Afghanistan, and Luke Land? Bridge Afghan F? Channel. The network of the Pakistani Verm? Assets and employees should distance itself from the Pakistani tribal areas G? Mortar along the Afghan border, through the s? Dliche Afghanistan and all the way to the capital Kabul. The leaked information contained in the papers is collected from raw intelligence and threat assessments from the field in Afghanistan. Nat? Course, not everything is as official secret agencies? Berpr? Ft are hardly likely forthcoming, but many of the reports st down? On sources believed to be reliably evaluated? R regularly by the military?. None of this brand new, nat? Of course. Reports describe how Pakistani intelligence has collaborated with Al Qaeda to plan attacks for some time. Even U.S. senators and congressmen have warned that Pakistan militant groups collaborate and Al-Qaeda, and are led by the ISI. Asc Sure, American officials ge? U? Ert are angry that Pakistan was not willing to confront? Brig, the attacks in the city? Height of Pakistani border guards to move? Over the Afghan-Pakistani border run, and then R? Ckzug on Pakistani territory, where they form a safe haven and are planning new attacks. What puzzles many ordinary Americans – and w tend Indians – is that in spite of being with growing evidence of Pakistan’s vulgarity and the frustrations of the American soldiers on the ground, put the U.S. government routinely strength comes public with rosy?? u hearing it from Pakistan as a verb? ally. It’s all about political Opportunit t nat? Of course. The U.S. military? R needs Pakistan’s support and collaboration to a drone sustained campaign against al-Qaida havens in the city? Height of the border. Dar? Is over, the most appropriate way to U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan by supply routes Berque Pakistan? To Afghanistan. Therefore, it should not surprise? That w? During a very j? Longest visit to Islamabad, was Hillary Clinton all the bonhomie, praised the Pakistani government and Verpf?’S REASONS another $ 500,000,000 come in development aid.
The painful truth is that the U.S. has recognized that the war in Afghanistan is not winnable in the Herk? Mmlichen sense. It was also on the Wei? E d takes care home? That Pr? President Obama any public explanation? Tion that U.S. troops begin coming home after July 2011 was perhaps alienate? Ht and optimistic. The U.S. is desperate for a face to true exit strategy from Afghanistan and Pakistan is gl? Glad to oblige, as long as they left solely to the legitimate government in Afghanistan to undermine and install their own puppets. Nevertheless, Pakistan has no secret of its ambitions to achieve what it has “strategic depth” to get its number one enemy, India? Account.
