In today’s world cups we see things that maybe some of us think, always a part of the game have to change how to team players during the game but it was a time when teams were not allowed to change players during each been of the match. This apparent perhaps incomprehensible to those who have not seen the World Cup games against Mexico was 70 but only that particular World Cup (the ninth’ve ever played), that the teams were finally bringing luxury to replacement allowed during the game.
Of course, it is clear to see why substitutions during a game are a more than a desirable thing. This will, as a team a player who can not only ineffective, but hurt to the point of replacing lagging that of the field or to have to be removed, leaving his team one man short. It is on these grounds that such an obvious factor for most of us today that the team should be able to replace players yet this was not the case, as far as FIFA worried or at least not seem to Mexico 70 mag. There will be many a game before, in Mexico where 70 teams were forced to a numerical disadvantage, or perhaps even worse play without a goalkeeper. It will carry out a case that another player had not yet developed to its function, which was perhaps never been a goalkeeper as it was, until FIFA responding.
Another thing that wait was long in coming, the method in today’s world cups used to regulate that qualifies for both teams at the end with the same amount of points. This system is the target of a differential in which the team have the most goals in relation to how many they scored scored against qualified. Of course there is a backup method to this, the difference should it, and this essence, the team has more goals of the two teams will be made in question. This as a matter of fact that Italy, as in 82 qualified ahead of Cameroon, as both teams after the first round of games each with 3 points with Cameroon with a goal for and against one against the left, while Italy had two goals for and. It is the fact that Italy is another goal that it sanctions instead of Cameroon qualify achieved. This is perhaps a clear solution of how such a dilemma should have been paid to Sweden 58 (sixth World Cup) teams that finished in the points are equally required to play an extra game to decide which one of the first into the next round. As an example of this point we could to Northern Ireland and Czechoslovakia, who were in Sweden 58, which forced an extra game that was won by Northern Ireland, but only in overtime to play. It is the Irish that went on in the next round where they faced France and lost 4-0. This may have been due to play four games instead of three as the French on the same stage. This proved once again the inability of the FIFA come up with practical solutions.
Finally, I would say that the above facts make it clear, at least for me, an organization that FIFA, a propensity to act very slowly to the solution of issues related to changes in their system to keep in order with the requirements who is playing and the times. Of course, for my part, I would add that, if FIFA has so many world championships allow only a finite, teams to replace players during the game, as this is a way without involving a cost or the implementation of advanced technologies, such as long it will take the use of video technology to implement? This is a method that is used in other professional sports such as tennis, American football and the National Hockey League with great success even FIFA refuses to continue to use it. My reason for this is probably that they certain teams to win greater international following and continue to referees to enable them to continue to do, even if it with funds to allow teams not to cheat so many fans outside their own country want.
This is perhaps the reason why video technology is imposed on FIFA, through pressure from outside, such as threatening some countries, their own international soccer organization if they do not, do not meet the standards dictated not only by most fans and nations by the world, but by simple logic. This is also the step that many Formula One teams threatens the governing body that the sport if they felt they were trying to regulations that implement their view the sport of Grand Prix Racing Limited. Of course, large firms could also add pressure by withdrawing its sponsorship of the tournament, which we more and more how it could be resolved to win, for certain teams to a higher market value such as Brazil, Argentina, Italy, England, Spain, Germany and some others. It is all too clear that much more often than not, when an error by an arbitrator, it favors the team with the larger international following, or the host team. As this occurred the case, which in the 2002 World Cup when South Korea, Brazil and Germany by bad calls that have not just supported, errors were deleted. These so-called “error” apparently after having made their way to South Africa in 2010, where Argentina and Germany benefited from the referee not see that are obviously more lucrative to set up the match between these two teams, in contrast to England, which one would match vs. Mexico.
